Current:Home > MarketsExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -Aspire Money Growth
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-14 04:45:55
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (984)
Related
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Fishing crew denied $3.5 million prize after their 619-pound marlin is bitten by a shark
- North Dakota's governor has signed a law banning nearly all abortions
- At least 4 dead and 2 critically hurt after overnight fire in NYC e-bike repair shop
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Tracking health threats, one sewage sample at a time
- Trump Admin. Halts Mountaintop Mining Health Risks Study by National Academies
- Jamil was struggling after his daughter had a stroke. Then a doctor pulled up a chair
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- States Look to Establish ‘Green Banks’ as Federal Cash Dries Up
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- Unraveling a hidden cause of UTIs — plus how to prevent them
- Hunter Biden reaches deal to plead guilty to tax charges following federal investigation
- She was pregnant and had to find $15,000 overnight to save her twins
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- What’s an Electric Car Champion Doing in Romney’s Inner Circle?
- Best Memorial Day 2023 Home Deals: Furniture, Mattresses, Air Fryers, Vacuums, Televisions, and More
- Medications Can Raise Heat Stroke Risk. Are Doctors Prepared to Respond as the Planet Warms?
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Minnesota to join at least 4 other states in protecting transgender care this year
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $360 Tote Bag for Just $76
New Tar Sands Oil Pipeline Isn’t Worth the Risks, Minnesota Officials Say
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
Fuzzy Math: How Do You Calculate Emissions From a Storage Tank When The Numbers Don’t Add Up?
NASA spacecraft captures glowing green dot on Jupiter caused by a lightning bolt